NARSINGH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — WPC/2229/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010177082026
Filing Number
WPC/10221/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPC/2229/2026
Registration Date
01-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NARSINGH
Adv. KAMLESH KUMAR PANDEY,AMITESH KUMAR PANDEY,AMITESH KUMAR PANDEY, ,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA
-
2.Shivmani Jaiswal
-
3.Shankar
-
4.Ajay Vajpai
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
-
2.The Collector
-
3.The Sub -Divisional
-
4.The Tahsildar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition seeking land allotment (patta) in favor of the petitioners by applying the precedent from WPC No. 1938/2026. The court directed the Collector to decide the petitioners' application expeditiously within 60 days of a fresh representation submitted within 15 days, and prohibited coercive action against the petitioners pending decision. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2229/2026
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition seeking land allotment (patta) in favor of the petitioners by applying the precedent from WPC No. 1938/2026. The court directed the Collector to decide the petitioners' application expeditiously within 60 days of a fresh representation submitted within 15 days, and prohibited coercive action against the petitioners pending decision. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts