RAMESH PANDEY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3865/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010176902026

Filing Number

WPS/10211/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3865/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS. ( 606 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH PANDEY

    Adv. VIKAS DUBEY,KOMAL PRASAD SAHU,KOMAL PRASAD SAHU, YASH MISHRA,RITA PANDEY,KOMAL PRASAD SAHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Directorate of Urban Administration and Development

  3. 3.Joint Director

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted an interim stay of departmental proceedings against petitioner Ramesh Pandey, a retired government employee. Pandey challenged a charge memo served 2.5 years after his retirement on October 31, 2023, alleging procedural violations and lack of proper sanction under the Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976. The court stayed the proceedings pending the next hearing scheduled for August 2026, and the State was granted 6 weeks to file its reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3865/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted an interim stay of departmental proceedings against petitioner Ramesh Pandey, a retired government employee. Pandey challenged a charge memo served 2.5 years after his retirement on October 31, 2023, alleging procedural violations and lack of proper sanction under the Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976. The court stayed the proceedings pending the next hearing scheduled for August 2026, and the State was granted 6 weeks to file its reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case