DR USHA SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3891/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010176682026

Filing Number

WPS/10195/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3891/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

PROMOTION. ( 608 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR USHA SAHU

    Adv. SHESHAV SHEKHAR BARIK,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL, ,PRANOTI DAS,PRANOTI DAS,RUDRA PRATAP DUBEY,Gaurav Singhal,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Under Secretary (Up-Sachiv)

  3. 3.The Commissioner

  4. 4.The Principal

  5. 5.Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission (PSC)

    Adv. DR. SUDEEP AGRAWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS 3891/2026 Dr. Usha Sahu, an Assistant Professor at V.Y.T. Government Postgraduate Science College, Durg, challenged her non-promotion to Professor, contending that her Annual Character Report (ACR) used against her was never communicated, violating procedural fairness. The court disposed of the petition by directing the state authorities and PSC to consider her fresh comprehensive representation within two months, allowing her to submit additional documents alongside her pending September 2025 representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3891/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS 3891/2026 Dr. Usha Sahu, an Assistant Professor at V.Y.T. Government Postgraduate Science College, Durg, challenged her non-promotion to Professor, contending that her Annual Character Report (ACR) used against her was never communicated, violating procedural fairness. The court disposed of the petition by directing the state authorities and PSC to consider her fresh comprehensive representation within two months, allowing her to submit additional documents alongside her pending September 2025 representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case