DR. B.D. JANGDE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3885/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010176582026
Filing Number
WPS/10187/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPS/3885/2026
Registration Date
01-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
PROMOTION. ( 608 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DR. B.D. JANGDE
Adv. SHESHAV SHEKHAR BARIK,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL, ,RUDRA PRATAP DUBEY,RUDRA PRATAP DUBEY,RUDRA PRATAP DUBEY,Gaurav Singhal,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Under Secretary (Up-Sachiv)
-
3.The Commissioner
-
4.The Principal
-
5.Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission (PSC)
Adv. DR. SUDEEP AGRAWAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
Case Summary: WPS/3885/2026 - Dr. B.D. Jangde v. State of Chhattisgarh Dr. B.D. Jangde, an Assistant Professor at Govt. Vedram College, challenged his non-promotion to Professor, alleging that uncommunicated Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) from 2008-2012 were improperly used against him without opportunity to respond. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition by permitting Jangde to submit a fresh comprehensive representation to respondents and directing the authorities to decide on uncommunicated ACRs within two months, in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3885/2026
Case Summary: WPS/3885/2026 - Dr. B.D. Jangde v. State of Chhattisgarh Dr. B.D. Jangde, an Assistant Professor at Govt. Vedram College, challenged his non-promotion to Professor, alleging that uncommunicated Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) from 2008-2012 were improperly used against him without opportunity to respond. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition by permitting Jangde to submit a fresh comprehensive representation to respondents and directing the authorities to decide on uncommunicated ACRs within two months, in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts