ROOPDHAR PRASAD SAO vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3884/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010176532026

Filing Number

WPS/10183/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3884/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROOPDHAR PRASAD SAO

    Adv. F.S.KHARE,RAM KUMAR TIWARI,RAM KUMAR TIWARI, ,MAMTA MAHILANGE,MAMTA MAHILANGE,NILU KUMARI SINGH,RAM KUMAR TIWARI

  2. 2.D.P. Dansena

  3. 3.Sudip Bhadra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Engineer in Chief

  3. 3.Chief Engineer

  4. 4.Superintending Engineer

  5. 5.Executive Engineer

  6. 6.Superintending Engineer

  7. 7.Executive Engineer

  8. 8.Joint Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition by permitting three PWD employees (formerly daily-wage workers whose services were regularized) to file fresh representations seeking pay scale revision per the 1982 Gazette notification. The court directed the competent authority to consider their cases within six months, following precedent from a similar 2012 coordinate bench order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3884/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition by permitting three PWD employees (formerly daily-wage workers whose services were regularized) to file fresh representations seeking pay scale revision per the 1982 Gazette notification. The court directed the competent authority to consider their cases within six months, following precedent from a similar 2012 coordinate bench order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case