BHOJRAM YADAW vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3875/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010176522026
Filing Number
WPS/10182/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPS/3875/2026
Registration Date
01-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHOJRAM YADAW
Adv. ANAND KUMAR KUJUR,Dr. Jitendra Kishor Mehta,Dr. Jitendra Kishor Mehta, ,Dr. Jitendra Kishor Mehta
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.State of Chhattisgarh
-
3.State of Chhattisgarh
-
4.State of Chhattisgarh
-
5.The Executive Engineer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
Case Summary: WPS/3875/2026 - Bhojram Yadaw v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the petition by permitting the retired Work Charged employee to submit a fresh representation for leave encashment benefits, citing the precedent of Faguvaram Patel case where similar claims were allowed. The court directed respondent authorities to decide the representation expeditiously within three months, applying principles established in the prior case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3875/2026
Case Summary: WPS/3875/2026 - Bhojram Yadaw v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the petition by permitting the retired Work Charged employee to submit a fresh representation for leave encashment benefits, citing the precedent of Faguvaram Patel case where similar claims were allowed. The court directed respondent authorities to decide the representation expeditiously within three months, applying principles established in the prior case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts