BHOJRAM YADAW vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3875/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010176522026

Filing Number

WPS/10182/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3875/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHOJRAM YADAW

    Adv. ANAND KUMAR KUJUR,Dr. Jitendra Kishor Mehta,Dr. Jitendra Kishor Mehta, ,Dr. Jitendra Kishor Mehta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.State of Chhattisgarh

  3. 3.State of Chhattisgarh

  4. 4.State of Chhattisgarh

  5. 5.The Executive Engineer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/3875/2026 - Bhojram Yadaw v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the petition by permitting the retired Work Charged employee to submit a fresh representation for leave encashment benefits, citing the precedent of Faguvaram Patel case where similar claims were allowed. The court directed respondent authorities to decide the representation expeditiously within three months, applying principles established in the prior case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3875/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/3875/2026 - Bhojram Yadaw v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the petition by permitting the retired Work Charged employee to submit a fresh representation for leave encashment benefits, citing the precedent of Faguvaram Patel case where similar claims were allowed. The court directed respondent authorities to decide the representation expeditiously within three months, applying principles established in the prior case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case