DR. ANIL KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3889/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010176512026

Filing Number

WPS/10181/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3889/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

PROMOTION. ( 608 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR. ANIL KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA

    Adv. SHESHAV SHEKHAR BARIK,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL, ,RUDRA PRATAP DUBEY,RUDRA PRATAP DUBEY,RUDRA PRATAP DUBEY,Gaurav Singhal,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Under Secretary (Up-Sachiv)

  3. 3.The Commissioner

  4. 4.The Principal

  5. 5.Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission (PSC)

    Adv. DR. SUDEEP AGRAWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS 3889/2026 Dr. Anil Kumar Shrivastava v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition by permitting Dr. Shrivastava, an Assistant Professor denied promotion to Professor, to submit a fresh comprehensive representation challenging the use of an uncommunicated Annual Confidential Report (ACR) in the promotion decision. The court directed respondents to decide the representation within two months in accordance with law, allowing the petitioner to raise his grievance regarding the procedurally flawed promotion process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3889/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS 3889/2026 Dr. Anil Kumar Shrivastava v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition by permitting Dr. Shrivastava, an Assistant Professor denied promotion to Professor, to submit a fresh comprehensive representation challenging the use of an uncommunicated Annual Confidential Report (ACR) in the promotion decision. The court directed respondents to decide the representation within two months in accordance with law, allowing the petitioner to raise his grievance regarding the procedurally flawed promotion process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case