JITENDRA KUMAR VERMA (LEGAL HEIR) vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3882/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010176502026

Filing Number

WPS/10180/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3882/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JITENDRA KUMAR VERMA (LEGAL HEIR)

    Adv. ANAND KUMAR KUJUR,Dr. Jitendra Kishor Mehta,Dr. Jitendra Kishor Mehta, ,Dr. Jitendra Kishor Mehta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

  3. 3.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

  4. 4.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

  5. 5.The Executive Engineer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the writ petition by permitting Jitendra Kumar Verma (legal heir of a retired work-charged employee) to submit a fresh representation seeking pay scale revision under the 1982 Gazette Notification. The court directed the competent authority to consider and decide the representation within six months, applying the same principles established in similar precedent cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3882/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the writ petition by permitting Jitendra Kumar Verma (legal heir of a retired work-charged employee) to submit a fresh representation seeking pay scale revision under the 1982 Gazette Notification. The court directed the competent authority to consider and decide the representation within six months, applying the same principles established in similar precedent cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case