SANAU RAM GOTA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/693/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010176442026

Filing Number

MCRCA/7466/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/693/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANAU RAM GOTA

    Adv. KISHORE NARAYAN,Pritam Singh,Pritam Singh, ,GAGAN PANDEY,AMARNATH PANDEY,Pritam Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRCA 693/2026 Court Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court ALLOWED Sanau Ram Gota's anticipatory bail application. The Chief Justice granted bail on a personal bond with surety, applying the principle of parity since a co-accused in the same case had already been granted bail. Key Reasoning: The court found no material evidence at that stage necessitating custodial interrogation. The case arose from a dispute over Christian burial rituals versus village customs, with allegations of assault and criminal intimidation under BNSS 2023 sections. Bail was granted subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses, court attendance, and future offence avoidance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/693/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRCA 693/2026 Court Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court ALLOWED Sanau Ram Gota's anticipatory bail application. The Chief Justice granted bail on a personal bond with surety, applying the principle of parity since a co-accused in the same case had already been granted bail. Key Reasoning: The court found no material evidence at that stage necessitating custodial interrogation. The case arose from a dispute over Christian burial rituals versus village customs, with allegations of assault and criminal intimidation under BNSS 2023 sections. Bail was granted subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses, court attendance, and future offence avoidance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case