HASAN ANSARI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/689/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010176392026

Filing Number

MCRCA/7461/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/689/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HASAN ANSARI

    Adv. ASHISH GUPTA,MANISH UPADHYAY,MANISH UPADHYAY, ,MINAKSHI GUPTA,ABHINAV TIWARI,MANISH UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: MCRCA 689/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Hasan Ansari, who faced charges under the Chhattisgarh Animal Protection Act for alleged illegal cattle transportation toward a slaughter house. The court found that Ansari was implicated on suspicion alone with no specific, independently corroborated role assigned, and no cattle recovered from his possession, distinguishing him from co-accused persons from whom 12 cattle were seized. Since Ansari is a permanent local resident with no flight risk or evidence of tampering, the court deemed him suitable for bail pending trial, subject to standard conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/689/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: MCRCA 689/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Hasan Ansari, who faced charges under the Chhattisgarh Animal Protection Act for alleged illegal cattle transportation toward a slaughter house. The court found that Ansari was implicated on suspicion alone with no specific, independently corroborated role assigned, and no cattle recovered from his possession, distinguishing him from co-accused persons from whom 12 cattle were seized. Since Ansari is a permanent local resident with no flight risk or evidence of tampering, the court deemed him suitable for bail pending trial, subject to standard conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case