SMT. SHRIYA PANDAY (DUBEY) vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1350/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010176332026
Filing Number
CRMP/7456/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRMP/1350/2026
Registration Date
11-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. SHRIYA PANDAY (DUBEY)
Adv. ASTHA SHARMA,UJJWAL CHOUBEY,UJJWAL CHOUBEY, ,Chandradeep Prasad,UJJWAL CHOUBEY,UJJWAL CHOUBEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Mamta Dubey
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: CRMP/1350/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed journalist Shriya Panday's petition to quash the FIR and charge-sheet filed against her under IPC sections 186, 353, 323, and 34. The court found that the 6+ year unexplained delay between the June 2018 incident and November 2024 charge-sheet violated her constitutional right to speedy trial under Article 21, causing serious prejudice. Additionally, the prosecution case rested solely on uncorroborated police statements without independent evidence establishing the essential ingredients of the alleged offences, and her presence at the police station was legitimate journalistic activity. The court concluded continuing proceedings would constitute abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Additional Registrar(j)
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/1350/2026
Case Summary: CRMP/1350/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed journalist Shriya Panday's petition to quash the FIR and charge-sheet filed against her under IPC sections 186, 353, 323, and 34. The court found that the 6+ year unexplained delay between the June 2018 incident and November 2024 charge-sheet violated her constitutional right to speedy trial under Article 21, causing serious prejudice. Additionally, the prosecution case rested solely on uncorroborated police statements without independent evidence establishing the essential ingredients of the alleged offences, and her presence at the police station was legitimate journalistic activity. The court concluded continuing proceedings would constitute abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts