CHINTARAM KASHYAP vs SANJAY AGNIHOTRI — CRMP/1293/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010176272026

Filing Number

CRMP/7451/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1293/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

APPLICATION U/S 528 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1411 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHINTARAM KASHYAP

    Adv. Samir Singh,ARVIND PRASAD,ARVIND PRASAD, ,ASHWELL FRANKLIN,ARVIND PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY AGNIHOTRI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Summary of CRMP No. 1293/2026 Chintaram Kashyap challenged the trial court's rejection of his application to submit salary slips and land ownership documents as evidence in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint against Sanjay Agnihotri. The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the stay application (I.A. No.01/2026), finding the trial court erred by rejecting the application without examining the documents' necessity merely because evidence had commenced. The trial court proceedings remain stayed pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  4. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1293/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRMP No. 1293/2026 Chintaram Kashyap challenged the trial court's rejection of his application to submit salary slips and land ownership documents as evidence in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint against Sanjay Agnihotri. The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the stay application (I.A. No.01/2026), finding the trial court erred by rejecting the application without examining the documents' necessity merely because evidence had commenced. The trial court proceedings remain stayed pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case