RAM KUMAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3832/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010176242026

Filing Number

WPS/10174/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3832/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

PAY SCALES/ INCREMENTS / ALLOWANCES. ( 610 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM KUMAR

    Adv. ANAND KUMAR KUJUR,Dr. Jitendra Kishor Mehta,Dr. Jitendra Kishor Mehta, ,Dr. Jitendra Kishor Mehta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.State of Chhattisgarh

  3. 3.State of Chhattisgarh

  4. 4.State of Chhattisgarh

  5. 5.Engineer-In-Chief

  6. 6.The Executive Engineer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS 3832/2026 Ram Kumar, a Time Keeper in the Public Works Department, sought revision of his pay scale per the 1982 Gazette Notification and arrears of salary. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition by permitting Kumar to submit a fresh representation to the competent authority, which must be considered and decided within six months in light of the 1982 notification, following a similar precedent established in 2013. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3832/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS 3832/2026 Ram Kumar, a Time Keeper in the Public Works Department, sought revision of his pay scale per the 1982 Gazette Notification and arrears of salary. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition by permitting Kumar to submit a fresh representation to the competent authority, which must be considered and decided within six months in light of the 1982 notification, following a similar precedent established in 2013. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case