BHUPENDRA SINGH KSHATRIYA @ BHUPENDRA THAKUR OFFICE REFERENCE, ,KSHITIJ SHARMA,RUCHI NAGAR,Pragalbha Sharma vs THE UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI, ,VAIBHAV A.GOVERDHAN — CRMP/1257/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010176152026
Filing Number
CRMP/7447/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRMP/1257/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION / MODIFICATION / EXTENSION OF TIME IN DECIDED CRIMINAL CASE ( 1450 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHUPENDRA SINGH KSHATRIYA @ BHUPENDRA THAKUR OFFICE REFERENCE, ,KSHITIJ SHARMA,RUCHI NAGAR,Pragalbha Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI, ,VAIBHAV A.GOVERDHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary - CRMP No. 1257/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted a further extension of 5 months (instead of the requested 8 months) to the trial court to conclude the CBI case against petitioner Bhupendra Singh Kshatriya. The trial had not been completed within the previously stipulated six-month period due to procedural impediments including non-service of summons on witnesses, change of presiding officer, and pending examination of approximately 20 prosecution witnesses—circumstances beyond the trial court's control. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/1257/2026
Case Summary - CRMP No. 1257/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted a further extension of 5 months (instead of the requested 8 months) to the trial court to conclude the CBI case against petitioner Bhupendra Singh Kshatriya. The trial had not been completed within the previously stipulated six-month period due to procedural impediments including non-service of summons on witnesses, change of presiding officer, and pending examination of approximately 20 prosecution witnesses—circumstances beyond the trial court's control. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts