LAVLESH NIRMALKAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4236/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010175992026

Filing Number

MCRC/7437/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4236/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAVLESH NIRMALKAR

    Adv. Hemant Kumar Sahu,Sukhnath Ram Bhagat,Sukhnath Ram Bhagat, ,SYED AFAQUE HUSSAIN RIZVI,Lavkush Kumar Sahu,Sukhnath Ram Bhagat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/4236/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected Lavlesh Nirmalkar's bail application in connection with a bank theft case at Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank, Branch Kunda. The court found the allegations serious—that Nirmalkar unlawfully entered the bank, broke three lockers, and was apprehended red-handed—and determined the gravity of the offences under BNS sections 62, 305(a), 331(4), 324(3) and PDPP Act 1984 precluded bail despite the applicant's claims of false implication and lack of direct evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4236/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/4236/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected Lavlesh Nirmalkar's bail application in connection with a bank theft case at Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank, Branch Kunda. The court found the allegations serious—that Nirmalkar unlawfully entered the bank, broke three lockers, and was apprehended red-handed—and determined the gravity of the offences under BNS sections 62, 305(a), 331(4), 324(3) and PDPP Act 1984 precluded bail despite the applicant's claims of false implication and lack of direct evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case