ONKAR PRASAD DEWANGAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3856/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010175922026

Filing Number

WPS/10159/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3856/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ONKAR PRASAD DEWANGAN

    Adv. HEMANT KESHARWANI,AAKASH SINGH,AAKASH SINGH, ,SWAPNIL KESHARI,DINESH YADAV,DINESH YADAV

  2. 2.Manoj Kumar Soni

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Engineer In chief

  3. 3.Chief Engineer

  4. 4.Superintendent Engineer

  5. 5.Executive Engineer

  6. 6.Executive Engineer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/3856/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition by permitting petitioners—retired Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees—to submit a fresh representation claiming leave encashment benefits. The court directed the respondent state authorities to decide the representation expeditiously within three months, applying the precedent established in the Faguvaram Patel case that granted similar relief to identically situated employees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3856/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/3856/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition by permitting petitioners—retired Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees—to submit a fresh representation claiming leave encashment benefits. The court directed the respondent state authorities to decide the representation expeditiously within three months, applying the precedent established in the Faguvaram Patel case that granted similar relief to identically situated employees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case