LOMESH GAUTAM ALIAS BABBAN GAUTAM vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4687/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010175902026

Filing Number

MCRC/7433/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4687/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LOMESH GAUTAM ALIAS BABBAN GAUTAM

    Adv. HEMANT GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Lomesh Gautam Alias Babban Gautam, arrested for possessing 34.20 liters of liquor under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. Considering his minimal criminal antecedent, filed chargesheet, prolonged detention since March 24, 2026, and anticipated lengthy trial, the court found bail warranted. He was released on personal bond with two sureties subject to stringent conditions including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment-seeking during evidence, and potential bail cancellation for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4687/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Lomesh Gautam Alias Babban Gautam, arrested for possessing 34.20 liters of liquor under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. Considering his minimal criminal antecedent, filed chargesheet, prolonged detention since March 24, 2026, and anticipated lengthy trial, the court found bail warranted. He was released on personal bond with two sureties subject to stringent conditions including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment-seeking during evidence, and potential bail cancellation for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case