JITENDRA SINGH PARIHAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4122/2026
Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010175722026
Filing Number
MCRC/7425/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCRC/4122/2026
Registration Date
01-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JITENDRA SINGH PARIHAR
Adv. Ali Afzaal Mirza,SHAMSUDDIN MIRZA,SHAMSUDDIN MIRZA, ,AHMED AYAAN MIRZA,AHMED AYAAN MIRZA,AHMED AYAAN MIRZA,Navin Shukla,SMITA JHA,SHAMSUDDIN MIRZA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: MCRC/4122/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected bail for Jitendra Singh Parihar, accused of causing his wife's death through dowry-related cruelty under Section 80(2) BNS 2023. The court found prima facie evidence of continuous harassment and Rs. 5 lakh dowry demands that allegedly led to her suicide by hanging within two years of marriage, supported by ante-mortem injuries and witness statements. Despite Parihar's custody since March 2026 and lack of criminal history, the court deemed the offense's seriousness insufficient to warrant bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/4122/2026
Case Summary: MCRC/4122/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected bail for Jitendra Singh Parihar, accused of causing his wife's death through dowry-related cruelty under Section 80(2) BNS 2023. The court found prima facie evidence of continuous harassment and Rs. 5 lakh dowry demands that allegedly led to her suicide by hanging within two years of marriage, supported by ante-mortem injuries and witness statements. Despite Parihar's custody since March 2026 and lack of criminal history, the court deemed the offense's seriousness insufficient to warrant bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts