KALINDAR RAM vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WA/473/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010175592026

Filing Number

WA/10138/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WA/473/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

REMOVAL / DISMISSAL / TERMINATION FROM SERVICE. ( 603 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALINDAR RAM

    Adv. KABEER KALWANI,Rishabh Gupta,Rishabh Gupta, ,SANDEEP PATEL,SHASHWAT MISHRA,ADITYA DHAR DIWAN,MAYANK GUPTA,Arpan Verma,Rishabh Gupta,Rishabh Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

  3. 3.The Commissioner Surguja Division

  4. 4.The Collector Balrampur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Kalindar Ram's appeal challenging the cancellation of his appointment as Assistant Grade-III. The court held that his appointment violated recruitment norms because it was made against subsequently sanctioned posts without a fresh advertisement, depriving other eligible candidates of constitutional rights to compete. The court determined that length of service cannot validate an appointment fundamentally contrary to public employment principles and affirmed the authorities' cancellation order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/473/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Kalindar Ram's appeal challenging the cancellation of his appointment as Assistant Grade-III. The court held that his appointment violated recruitment norms because it was made against subsequently sanctioned posts without a fresh advertisement, depriving other eligible candidates of constitutional rights to compete. The court determined that length of service cannot validate an appointment fundamentally contrary to public employment principles and affirmed the authorities' cancellation order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case