HARISH KUMAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3896/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010175192026

Filing Number

WPS/10110/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3896/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARISH KUMAR

    Adv. Rupendra Kumar Dewangan,Govind Prasad Dewangan,Govind Prasad Dewangan, ,HEMLATA DEWANGAN,Govind Prasad Dewangan

  2. 2.Chakradhar Patel

  3. 3.Nandkumar Sahu

  4. 4.Rajesh Kumar

  5. 5.Radheshyam

  6. 6.Gautam Kumar Shori

  7. 7.Gopal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director

  3. 3.Joint Director

  4. 4.District Education Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/3896/2026 Seven government school teachers in Chhattisgarh challenged the requirement to deposit one month's salary when tendering "technical resignations" after being promoted to superior teaching posts within the same department. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition, directing the District Education Officer (Respondent No. 4) to decide the teachers' pending representations seeking refund of the deposited salary within three months, in accordance with law and on merit, without adjudicating the substantive claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3896/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/3896/2026 Seven government school teachers in Chhattisgarh challenged the requirement to deposit one month's salary when tendering "technical resignations" after being promoted to superior teaching posts within the same department. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition, directing the District Education Officer (Respondent No. 4) to decide the teachers' pending representations seeking refund of the deposited salary within three months, in accordance with law and on merit, without adjudicating the substantive claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case