RAVI KUMAR SHRIWASH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3850/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010175152026

Filing Number

WPS/10106/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3850/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI KUMAR SHRIWASH

    Adv. Rupendra Kumar Dewangan,Govind Prasad Dewangan,Govind Prasad Dewangan, ,HEMLATA DEWANGAN,Govind Prasad Dewangan

  2. 2.Yeshvant Gupta

  3. 3.Rupdhar Pradhan

  4. 4.Bipin Kumar Seth

  5. 5.Purushottam Sahu

  6. 6.Hemant Patel

  7. 7.Janmajai Singh Rathia

  8. 8.Deendayal Patel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director

  3. 3.Joint Director

  4. 4.District Education Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/3850/2026 Eight teachers who were promoted from Assistant Teacher to Teacher positions challenged the requirement to deposit one month's salary as a condition for their technical resignation. The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the District Education Officer (Respondent No. 4) to reconsider their pending representations within three months, finding merit in their argument that such deposits were unnecessary for promotions within the same department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3850/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/3850/2026 Eight teachers who were promoted from Assistant Teacher to Teacher positions challenged the requirement to deposit one month's salary as a condition for their technical resignation. The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the District Education Officer (Respondent No. 4) to reconsider their pending representations within three months, finding merit in their argument that such deposits were unnecessary for promotions within the same department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case