RAJESH KUMAR VERMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3906/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010175122026

Filing Number

WPS/10103/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3906/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RECOVERY OF PAYMENT ( 632 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH KUMAR VERMA

    Adv. Rupendra Kumar Dewangan,Govind Prasad Dewangan,Govind Prasad Dewangan, ,HEMLATA DEWANGAN,Govind Prasad Dewangan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Secretary

  3. 3.Commissioner

  4. 4.Collector

  5. 5.Assistant Commissioner

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/3906/2026 Court Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the Assistant Commissioner (Respondent No.5) to decide petitioner Rajesh Kumar Verma's pending representation regarding refund of one month's salary (Rs.33,128) deposited during his technical resignation within three months. The petitioner, promoted from Assistant Teacher to Lecturer in the same department, challenged the salary deposit requirement as unlawful for intra-departmental transfers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3906/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/3906/2026 Court Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the Assistant Commissioner (Respondent No.5) to decide petitioner Rajesh Kumar Verma's pending representation regarding refund of one month's salary (Rs.33,128) deposited during his technical resignation within three months. The petitioner, promoted from Assistant Teacher to Lecturer in the same department, challenged the salary deposit requirement as unlawful for intra-departmental transfers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case