JUNAID ALAM vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4287/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010175072026
Filing Number
MCRC/7408/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCRC/4287/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JUNAID ALAM
Adv. Deepali Gupta,DIWESH KUMAR,DIWESH KUMAR, ,DIWESH KUMAR
-
2.Afsaar
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: MCRC No. 4287/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Junaid Alam and Afsaar, accused of cattle theft under Sections 303(2) and 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Court allowed the bail application on grounds of parity, noting that co-accused persons had already been granted bail and the applicants had been incarcerated since January 6, 2026, with trial expected to take considerable time. Bail was granted on conditions including personal bonds with two sureties each and multiple undertakings regarding court attendance and non-adjournment of evidence proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/4287/2026
Case Summary: MCRC No. 4287/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Junaid Alam and Afsaar, accused of cattle theft under Sections 303(2) and 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Court allowed the bail application on grounds of parity, noting that co-accused persons had already been granted bail and the applicants had been incarcerated since January 6, 2026, with trial expected to take considerable time. Bail was granted on conditions including personal bonds with two sureties each and multiple undertakings regarding court attendance and non-adjournment of evidence proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts