MOHD. SHAHABUDDIN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2267/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010174912026
Filing Number
WPC/10086/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPC/2267/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
RELIGIOUS & CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS ( 20 )
Sub-Category
WAKF BOARD MATTERS. ( 2002 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHD. SHAHABUDDIN
Adv. YOGENDRA CHATURVEDI,NAJMI BEGAM,NAJMI BEGAM, ,SHUBHAM TIWARI,DEEPA CHATURVEDI,NAJMI BEGAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Chhattisgarh State Waqf Board
Adv. PRATEEK SHARMA
-
3.District Collector
-
4.Sub Divisional Officer (R)/SDM
-
5.Mohd. Yusuf
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the Tahsildar to enforce earlier orders and obtain all waqf records, accounts, and documents from the former Mutawalli (Respondent No. 6) for handover to the newly elected Mutawalli (petitioner), holding that absent any restraint order against the petitioner, the competent authorities' transfer orders must be complied with. The court further granted the petitioner liberty to pursue proceedings under Section 68 of the Waqf Act, 1995, directing expedited consideration by authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2267/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the Tahsildar to enforce earlier orders and obtain all waqf records, accounts, and documents from the former Mutawalli (Respondent No. 6) for handover to the newly elected Mutawalli (petitioner), holding that absent any restraint order against the petitioner, the competent authorities' transfer orders must be complied with. The court further granted the petitioner liberty to pursue proceedings under Section 68 of the Waqf Act, 1995, directing expedited consideration by authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts