KSHAMANIDHI SAO vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4204/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010174772026

Filing Number

MCRC/7399/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4204/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KSHAMANIDHI SAO

    Adv. KISHORE NARAYAN,AMARNATH PANDEY,AMARNATH PANDEY, ,GAGAN PANDEY,Pritam Singh,AMARNATH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    SUMMARY OF MCRC/4204/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed Kshamanidhi Sao's bail application in a case involving alleged paddy stock shortage at a procurement centre. While the court acknowledged the prosecution's allegation that the applicant mismanaged stock, resulting in a 3,325-bag shortage and Rs. 41.23 lakh loss to the government, it granted bail considering the applicant's lack of criminal antecedents, the filing of the charge-sheet, and the preliminary verification report showing the initial shortage was overstated (only 454 bags shortage upon re-verification). The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties, subject to stringent conditions including mandatory court attendance and prohibition on adjournment requests during evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4204/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY OF MCRC/4204/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed Kshamanidhi Sao's bail application in a case involving alleged paddy stock shortage at a procurement centre. While the court acknowledged the prosecution's allegation that the applicant mismanaged stock, resulting in a 3,325-bag shortage and Rs. 41.23 lakh loss to the government, it granted bail considering the applicant's lack of criminal antecedents, the filing of the charge-sheet, and the preliminary verification report showing the initial shortage was overstated (only 454 bags shortage upon re-verification). The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties, subject to stringent conditions including mandatory court attendance and prohibition on adjournment requests during evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case