BOBBY KHATRI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4189/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010174752026

Filing Number

MCRC/7398/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4189/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BOBBY KHATRI

    Adv. ARUN KUKREJA,KALESH RAM,KALESH RAM, ,VINDHYAWASHINI SONI,VINDHYAWASHINI SONI,NAITIKA SAHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Bobby Khatri in his second bail application for alleged involvement in a cyber fraud scheme involving 128 "mule accounts" at Bank of Maharashtra used to receive defrauded money (Rs. 64,10,855/-). The court allowed bail on parity grounds, given that co-accused Ishika Singh was granted bail by the Supreme Court and other co-accused received bail from the same court, despite the charge-sheet being filed. Bail was conditional on personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance conditions including mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4189/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Bobby Khatri in his second bail application for alleged involvement in a cyber fraud scheme involving 128 "mule accounts" at Bank of Maharashtra used to receive defrauded money (Rs. 64,10,855/-). The court allowed bail on parity grounds, given that co-accused Ishika Singh was granted bail by the Supreme Court and other co-accused received bail from the same court, despite the charge-sheet being filed. Bail was conditional on personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance conditions including mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case