RAHUL YADAV ABHISHEK TANDON, ,K. ANKIT vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4303/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010174642026

Filing Number

MCRC/7391/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4303/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL YADAV ABHISHEK TANDON, ,K. ANKIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary of MCRC No. 4303/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Rahul Yadav's second bail application in a cyber fraud and illegal betting case. The court found that Yadav knowingly rented a bank account for Rs. 20,000 from a co-accused and used it for illegal betting operations through the Mahadev Book Satta App, with suspicious transactions totaling crores. The court upheld its earlier bail rejection, deeming him unsuitable for regular bail given the substantial evidence of involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4303/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MCRC No. 4303/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Rahul Yadav's second bail application in a cyber fraud and illegal betting case. The court found that Yadav knowingly rented a bank account for Rs. 20,000 from a co-accused and used it for illegal betting operations through the Mahadev Book Satta App, with suspicious transactions totaling crores. The court upheld its earlier bail rejection, deeming him unsuitable for regular bail given the substantial evidence of involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case