ASIF KHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4100/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010174622026

Filing Number

MCRC/7389/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4100/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASIF KHAN

    Adv. KHILENDRA SAHU,RAJENDRA PATEL,RAJENDRA PATEL, ,ANIRUDDHA SHRIVASTAVA,ANIRUDDHA SHRIVASTAVA,RAJENDRA PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Asif Khan, arrested for possessing 1.323 kg of ganja under Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985. The court found the seized quantity was below commercial threshold, the applicant had no criminal antecedents, and a co-accused in identical circumstances had already been granted bail, warranting equal treatment. Bail was granted with conditions requiring personal bond, two sureties, court attendance, and no adjournment-seeking during evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4100/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Asif Khan, arrested for possessing 1.323 kg of ganja under Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985. The court found the seized quantity was below commercial threshold, the applicant had no criminal antecedents, and a co-accused in identical circumstances had already been granted bail, warranting equal treatment. Bail was granted with conditions requiring personal bond, two sureties, court attendance, and no adjournment-seeking during evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case