FULBASAN SATNAMI (AJGALLE) vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/696/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010174502026

Filing Number

MCRCA/7377/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/696/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FULBASAN SATNAMI (AJGALLE)

    Adv. UDHO RAM KOSHALEY,GURU PRASAD KURRE,GURU PRASAD KURRE, ,GURU PRASAD KURRE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed Fulbasan Satnami's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in a case involving alleged possession of 12 kg raw cow meat under the CG Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 2004. The court granted bail considering that a similarly situated co-accused (Janaki) had already been granted anticipatory bail, the applicant is a woman, and the trial would take considerable time, despite the State's opposition citing prior excise-related criminal antecedents. Bail was granted on conditions including personal bond, surety, court appearance, and non-involvement in similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/696/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed Fulbasan Satnami's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in a case involving alleged possession of 12 kg raw cow meat under the CG Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 2004. The court granted bail considering that a similarly situated co-accused (Janaki) had already been granted anticipatory bail, the applicant is a woman, and the trial would take considerable time, despite the State's opposition citing prior excise-related criminal antecedents. Bail was granted on conditions including personal bond, surety, court appearance, and non-involvement in similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case