KISHAN BANJARE URF KISHOR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4251/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010174432026

Filing Number

MCRC/7371/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4251/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHAN BANJARE URF KISHOR

    Adv. SAMDARSH NIRANKARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Kishan Banjare Urf Kishor, charged with armed robbery and illegal weapons possession in connection with a 2021 street robbery. The court found that his prior absconding on two occasions during trial, resulting in a re-arrest warrant, combined with the serious nature of the charges, made him unsuitable for bail at that stage. The court directed the trial court to proceed expeditiously and to separate his trial from the absconding co-accused if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4251/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Kishan Banjare Urf Kishor, charged with armed robbery and illegal weapons possession in connection with a 2021 street robbery. The court found that his prior absconding on two occasions during trial, resulting in a re-arrest warrant, combined with the serious nature of the charges, made him unsuitable for bail at that stage. The court directed the trial court to proceed expeditiously and to separate his trial from the absconding co-accused if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case