GULSHAN MANJHI @ GULLA YASH TRIPATHI, ,Shivali Dubey,Shivali Dubey,Shivali Dubey,SHIVANG DUBEY,SHAILENDRA DUBEY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4264/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010174252026

Filing Number

MCRC/7363/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4264/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULSHAN MANJHI @ GULLA YASH TRIPATHI, ,Shivali Dubey,Shivali Dubey,Shivali Dubey,SHIVANG DUBEY,SHAILENDRA DUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to applicant Gulshan Manjhi, accused under Section 64 BNS (alleged consensual sexual relations on false promise of marriage), considering that the victim is a major aged 22, the relationship was consensual though unfulfilled, the victim turned hostile in court, the chargesheet was already filed, and the applicant had been in jail since September 2025 with trial likely to take considerable time. Bail was granted with strict conditions including personal bond with two sureties and requirements for court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4264/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to applicant Gulshan Manjhi, accused under Section 64 BNS (alleged consensual sexual relations on false promise of marriage), considering that the victim is a major aged 22, the relationship was consensual though unfulfilled, the victim turned hostile in court, the chargesheet was already filed, and the applicant had been in jail since September 2025 with trial likely to take considerable time. Bail was granted with strict conditions including personal bond with two sureties and requirements for court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case