TEJ BAHADUR PATEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4235/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010173762026

Filing Number

MCRC/7343/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4235/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TEJ BAHADUR PATEL

    Adv. VIKAS KUMAR PANDEY,ADARSH RAJPUT,ADARSH RAJPUT, ,TITRA RAM PATEL,ADARSH RAJPUT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Tej Bahadur Patel, arrested for theft of railway materials worth Rs. 2 crores from the Gevra-Pendra Railway Project site. The court found that prolonged custody was unwarranted since the charge-sheet was filed, no incriminating material was seized from him, he worked as a JCB operator with no criminal record, and similarly situated co-accused had already received bail. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions requiring court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4235/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Tej Bahadur Patel, arrested for theft of railway materials worth Rs. 2 crores from the Gevra-Pendra Railway Project site. The court found that prolonged custody was unwarranted since the charge-sheet was filed, no incriminating material was seized from him, he worked as a JCB operator with no criminal record, and similarly situated co-accused had already received bail. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions requiring court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case