RAMLAL JAYSAWAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4067/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010173682026

Filing Number

MCRC/7338/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4067/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMLAL JAYSAWAL

    Adv. SAMEER RIGRI,Sachin Nidhi,Sachin Nidhi, ,AISHWARY DIWAN,AISHWARY DIWAN,ANJAY MISHRA,Sachin Nidhi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/4067/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed Ramlal Jaysawal's bail application in an excise case involving seizure of 23.600 bulk liters of mahua liquor from his house. The court granted bail considering that the applicant had only one prior criminal antecedent (pending since 2023), had been in custody since February 15, 2026, and the trial would take considerable time. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties and conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment seeking during evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4067/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/4067/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed Ramlal Jaysawal's bail application in an excise case involving seizure of 23.600 bulk liters of mahua liquor from his house. The court granted bail considering that the applicant had only one prior criminal antecedent (pending since 2023), had been in custody since February 15, 2026, and the trial would take considerable time. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties and conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment seeking during evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case