AKSHAY DEWANGAN vs DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE Advocate - A.G., ,Ashish Tiwari — WPS/2877/2024

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010173552024

Filing Number

WPS/9924/2024

Filing Date

21-May-2024

Registration No

WPS/2877/2024

Registration Date

28-May-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

SELECTION, APPOINTMENT & RECRUITMENT INCLUDING EXAMINATION, INTERVIEW. ( 614 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKSHAY DEWANGAN

    Adv. AVINASH K.MISHRA,SANDEEP K. SHARMA,SANDEEP K. SHARMA, ,Varsha Sharma,Varsha Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE Advocate - A.G., ,Ashish Tiwari

  2. 2.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/2877/2024 - Akshay Dewangan v. District and Session Judge The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed the District Judge's non-speaking order rejecting the petitioner's representation for appointment to unfilled ex-serviceman reserved positions. The court held that administrative authorities must pass reasoned and speaking orders when rejecting representations, as mere reference to prior rejections of similar claims violates principles of natural justice. The District Judge was directed to reconsider the petitioner's representation within six weeks, applying applicable law regarding the advertisement clause that unfilled reserved posts should be filled from the unreserved open category. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  5. 07-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  8. 11-Sep-2025

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  9. 05-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  10. 05-Aug-2025

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  11. 18-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  12. 18-Jul-2025

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  13. 19-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  14. 19-Jun-2025

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  15. 09-May-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  16. 28-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  17. 09-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  18. 28-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  19. 10-Jul-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  20. 13-Jun-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  21. 13-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 21-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/2877/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/2877/2024 - Akshay Dewangan v. District and Session Judge The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed the District Judge's non-speaking order rejecting the petitioner's representation for appointment to unfilled ex-serviceman reserved positions. The court held that administrative authorities must pass reasoned and speaking orders when rejecting representations, as mere reference to prior rejections of similar claims violates principles of natural justice. The District Judge was directed to reconsider the petitioner's representation within six weeks, applying applicable law regarding the advertisement clause that unfilled reserved posts should be filled from the unreserved open category. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case