ONKAR PRASAD SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3800/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010173482026
Filing Number
WPS/10021/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPS/3800/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
REGULARIZATION OF AD-HOC EMPLOYEES ETC. ( 602 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ONKAR PRASAD SAHU
Adv. MANOJ CHAUHAN,SOMKANT VERMA,SOMKANT VERMA, ,SOMKANT VERMA
-
2.Dheeraj Kumar Karociya
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Director Directorate of Ayurveda
-
3.The Principal Government Ayurved College and Hospital,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: WPS 3800/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition filed by two daily-wage workers (a driver and peon) who had completed 11+ years of service at Government Ayurved College without regularization. The court permitted them to submit fresh representation to the AYUSH Director and College Principal, directing these authorities to decide on regularization within 4 months, considering the petitioners' lengthy service period and recent Supreme Court precedents emphasizing that states cannot perpetually engage essential workers on temporary contracts while circumventing regular employment obligations and constitutional fairness principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3800/2026
CASE SUMMARY: WPS 3800/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition filed by two daily-wage workers (a driver and peon) who had completed 11+ years of service at Government Ayurved College without regularization. The court permitted them to submit fresh representation to the AYUSH Director and College Principal, directing these authorities to decide on regularization within 4 months, considering the petitioners' lengthy service period and recent Supreme Court precedents emphasizing that states cannot perpetually engage essential workers on temporary contracts while circumventing regular employment obligations and constitutional fairness principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts