BRANCH MANAGER vs SMT. RANI SAHU — MAC/1227/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010173082026

Filing Number

MAC/9998/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

MAC/1227/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO WORKMEN COMPENSATION ACT. ( 1206 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BRANCH MANAGER

    Adv. PANKAJ AGRAWAL,AASHA NIRMALKAR,AASHA NIRMALKAR, ,PREETI YADAV,SWATI AGRAWAL,A. SANDHYA RAO,R.K. Verma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. RANI SAHU

  2. 2.Kumari Yashu Sahu

  3. 3.Punit Kumar Sahu

  4. 4.Ram Ratan Sahu

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted MAC No. 1227/2026 on 16/06/2026, a motor accident claim appeal by Branch Manager against Smt. Rani Sahu and others. The court condoned an 18-day delay in filing the appeal and admitted it for hearing on the substantial question of law: whether the tribunal erred in treating the deceased (Yogesh Sahu) as an employee of the vehicle owner (Ram Ratan Sahu), despite being his son. Notice was issued to respondents on the question of law and a stay application, with the Labour Court record to be called subsequently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/1227/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted MAC No. 1227/2026 on 16/06/2026, a motor accident claim appeal by Branch Manager against Smt. Rani Sahu and others. The court condoned an 18-day delay in filing the appeal and admitted it for hearing on the substantial question of law: whether the tribunal erred in treating the deceased (Yogesh Sahu) as an employee of the vehicle owner (Ram Ratan Sahu), despite being his son. Notice was issued to respondents on the question of law and a stay application, with the Labour Court record to be called subsequently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case