GANESH PRASAD SHUKLA vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI — WPS/3903/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010173042026

Filing Number

WPS/9994/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3903/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GANESH PRASAD SHUKLA

    Adv. VARUN SHARMA,AMAN KUMAR KESHARWANI,AMAN KUMAR KESHARWANI, ,VIVEK SHARMA,KRISHNA TANDON,AMAN KUMAR KESHARWANI

  2. 2.Seuk Rak Sahu

  3. 3.Ramkumar Dubey

  4. 4.Yogendra Dhar Diwan

  5. 5.Smt, Rakhi Ganguly

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI

  2. 2.Employees Privident Fund Organization (EPFO)

    Adv. SUNIL PILLAI

  3. 3.Assistant Privident Fund Commissioiner

  4. 4.Jila Sahkari kendriya Bank Maryuadit

    Adv. MANISH UPADHYAY,ABHINAV TIWARI ASHISH GUPTA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: In WPS No. 3903/2026 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the court ordered that upon payment of the requisite Provident Fund (PF) as per rules, notice shall be issued to respondent No. 4 with a return date of three weeks. The case was adjourned pending compliance with this condition and response from the fourth respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3903/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WPS No. 3903/2026 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the court ordered that upon payment of the requisite Provident Fund (PF) as per rules, notice shall be issued to respondent No. 4 with a return date of three weeks. The case was adjourned pending compliance with this condition and response from the fourth respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case