GOPAL SINGH AYAM vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3911/2026
Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 06th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010172902026
Filing Number
WPS/9982/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPS/3911/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
SUSPENSION. ( 604 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOPAL SINGH AYAM
Adv. A.N.PANDEY,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA, ,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.District Education Officer - Balrampur
-
3.Block Education Officer - Wadrafnagar
-
4.Sunil Singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
Case Summary: WPS/3911/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Assistant Teacher Gopal Singh Ayam's writ petition after the State objected that he had an efficacious alternative remedy available through appeal under Rule 23 of the Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966. The petitioner's counsel agreed and withdrew the petition with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal process, which the court directed be decided expeditiously within 45 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3911/2026
Case Summary: WPS/3911/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Assistant Teacher Gopal Singh Ayam's writ petition after the State objected that he had an efficacious alternative remedy available through appeal under Rule 23 of the Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966. The petitioner's counsel agreed and withdrew the petition with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal process, which the court directed be decided expeditiously within 45 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts