UBAR DAS vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3895/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010172852026

Filing Number

WPS/9978/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3895/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UBAR DAS

    Adv. HEMANT KESHARWANI,AAKASH SINGH,AAKASH SINGH, ,SWAPNIL KESHARI,JITENDRA BANJARA,AAKASH SINGH

  2. 2.Munshi Ram

  3. 3.Harpat Ram

  4. 4.Smt Tapeshwari

  5. 5.Ramgahan Uike

  6. 6.Kunwar Lal Panth

  7. 7.Ujit Lal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Engineer in Chief

  3. 3.Chief Engineer

  4. 4.Superintendent Engineer

  5. 5.Executive Engineer

  6. 6.Executive Engineer

  7. 7.Executive Engineer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/3895/2026 Seven retired work-charge laborers from Chhattisgarh's Public Works Department sought gratuity benefits and interest on delayed payment. The court disposed of the petition by directing respondent authorities (Chief Engineer and Superintendent Engineer) to consider the petitioners' fresh representation within three months, in accordance with a prior Division Bench decision in WA No. 378/2016, with the State offering no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3895/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/3895/2026 Seven retired work-charge laborers from Chhattisgarh's Public Works Department sought gratuity benefits and interest on delayed payment. The court disposed of the petition by directing respondent authorities (Chief Engineer and Superintendent Engineer) to consider the petitioners' fresh representation within three months, in accordance with a prior Division Bench decision in WA No. 378/2016, with the State offering no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case