BHUNESHWAR SAHU OM.P. SAHU, ,Nishi Kant Sinha,Nishi Kant Sinha,Nishi Kant Sinha,Nishi Kant Sinha,MINAKSHI GUPTA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/690/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010172752026
Filing Number
MCRCA/7302/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCRCA/690/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHUNESHWAR SAHU OM.P. SAHU, ,Nishi Kant Sinha,Nishi Kant Sinha,Nishi Kant Sinha,Nishi Kant Sinha,MINAKSHI GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: MCRCA 690/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to Bhuneshwar Sahu in a cheating case involving Rs. 39.10 lakh allegedly invested in share trading with false promises of doubling returns. Key Reasoning: The court applied the principle of parity, noting that co-accused persons had already been granted bail in identical circumstances. Since investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, and no evidence suggested risk of absconding or evidence tampering, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The dispute was characterized as essentially a financial transaction matter. Bail Conditions: Release required personal bond plus surety, with restrictions on witness intimidation, mandatory court appearances, and prohibition against similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRCA/690/2026
Case Summary: MCRCA 690/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to Bhuneshwar Sahu in a cheating case involving Rs. 39.10 lakh allegedly invested in share trading with false promises of doubling returns. Key Reasoning: The court applied the principle of parity, noting that co-accused persons had already been granted bail in identical circumstances. Since investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, and no evidence suggested risk of absconding or evidence tampering, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The dispute was characterized as essentially a financial transaction matter. Bail Conditions: Release required personal bond plus surety, with restrictions on witness intimidation, mandatory court appearances, and prohibition against similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts