MALTI DEVI BANJARE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3860/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010172462026

Filing Number

WPS/9965/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3860/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO BENEFIT OF KRAMONNATI ( 635 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MALTI DEVI BANJARE

    Adv. MATEEN SIDDIQUI,SANDEEP SINGH,SANDEEP SINGH, ,RUPESH SAHU,APOORVA PANDEY,APOORVA PANDEY,APOORVA PANDEY,ZAINAB MUSTAFA VANAK,DANISH AHMAD SIDDIQUI,ABHYUDAY TRIPATHI,waquar naiyer,NARENDRA MEHAR,SANDEEP SINGH

  2. 2.Priyanka Khute

  3. 3.Manju Kurre

  4. 4.Smt. Suchita Kerketta

  5. 5.Smt. Anjali Sahoo

  6. 6.Mithlesh Kumar Rao

  7. 7.Khelawan Kumar Nirala

  8. 8.Rampal Patel

  9. 9.Budhram Patel

  10. 10.Purnima Patel

  11. 11.Barat Ram Nishad

  12. 12.Smt. Phool Kumari Sahu

  13. 13.Rupesh Kumar Verma

  14. 14.Shiv Kumar Sahu

  15. 15.Smt. Rukmani Patel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Secretary,

  3. 3.Director,

  4. 4.Commissioner Cum Director,

  5. 5.District Education Officer

  6. 6.Block Education Officer,

  7. 7.Chief Executive Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/3860/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition. The court held that petitioners, originally appointed as Panchayat employees and later absorbed into the Education Department in 2018, do not qualify for Kramonnati Vetanman (pay increment benefit) because they remain governed by Panchayat Raj rules rather than School Education Department rules, failing the eligibility criteria established in the 2017 circular. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3860/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/3860/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition. The court held that petitioners, originally appointed as Panchayat employees and later absorbed into the Education Department in 2018, do not qualify for Kramonnati Vetanman (pay increment benefit) because they remain governed by Panchayat Raj rules rather than School Education Department rules, failing the eligibility criteria established in the 2017 circular. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case