RAJENDRA KUMAR GHRITLAHRE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3396/2023
Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010172222023
Filing Number
WPS/9729/2023
Filing Date
24-May-2023
Registration No
WPS/3396/2023
Registration Date
25-May-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
SELECTION, APPOINTMENT & RECRUITMENT INCLUDING EXAMINATION, INTERVIEW. ( 614 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJENDRA KUMAR GHRITLAHRE
Adv. SAKSHI BALI,PREETI YADAV,PREETI YADAV, ,JAINENDRA KUMAR SHASTRI,JAINENDRA KUMAR SHASTRI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Commissioner,
-
3.Collector
-
4.Assistant Commissioner,
Case History
-
07-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF
On 07/05/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the case WPS No. 3396/2023 (Rajendra Kumar Ghritlahre vs. State of Chhattisgarh) for two weeks. The petitioner appeared without representation while counsel for the State was present. No substantive order on merits was passed at this hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
31-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
10-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
30-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
21-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
26-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
29-May-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
29-May-2023
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
-
24-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3396/2023
On 07/05/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the case WPS No. 3396/2023 (Rajendra Kumar Ghritlahre vs. State of Chhattisgarh) for two weeks. The petitioner appeared without representation while counsel for the State was present. No substantive order on merits was passed at this hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts