JAYANT VASTRAKAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4197/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010171782026

Filing Number

MCRC/7247/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4197/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYANT VASTRAKAR

    Adv. SHRIKANT KAUSHIK,RISHIKANT MAHOBIA,RISHIKANT MAHOBIA, ,RISHIKANT MAHOBIA

  2. 2.Niket Vastrakar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/4197/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the second bail application of Jayant Vastrakar and Niket Vastrakar in a narcotic drugs case. The applicants were arrested for allegedly possessing and attempting to sell Buprenorphine injections (a controlled substance) exceeding commercial quantity limits under Sections 21, 22, and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. The court found no new grounds warranting bail reconsideration, as the quantity of contraband seized remained above commercial thresholds and the applicants failed to provide adequate explanation, affirming the earlier rejection from December 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4197/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/4197/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the second bail application of Jayant Vastrakar and Niket Vastrakar in a narcotic drugs case. The applicants were arrested for allegedly possessing and attempting to sell Buprenorphine injections (a controlled substance) exceeding commercial quantity limits under Sections 21, 22, and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. The court found no new grounds warranting bail reconsideration, as the quantity of contraband seized remained above commercial thresholds and the applicants failed to provide adequate explanation, affirming the earlier rejection from December 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case