KU. SHAKUNTALA RATHORE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WA/477/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010171712026
Filing Number
WA/9927/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
WA/477/2026
Registration Date
20-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KU. SHAKUNTALA RATHORE
Adv. SUNIL KUMAR SONI
-
2.Smt. Krishna Devi Sahu
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Director
-
3.Commissioner
-
4.Joint Director Education
-
5.Collector
-
6.Collector
-
7.District Education Officer
-
8.District Education Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: WA/477/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ appeal filed by two Commerce lecturers challenging their transfer under the State's Rationalization Scheme. The court upheld their declaration as "excess" and subsequent transfer from Government Higher Secondary School, Sivani (where no Commerce students were enrolled) to schools in Mungeli district where Commerce students were available, finding the process complied with the rationalization policy and involved proper counselling by competent authorities. The court held that absence of substantiated evidence of discriminatory treatment or procedural irregularity precluded judicial interference in administrative employment decisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WA/477/2026
Case Summary: WA/477/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ appeal filed by two Commerce lecturers challenging their transfer under the State's Rationalization Scheme. The court upheld their declaration as "excess" and subsequent transfer from Government Higher Secondary School, Sivani (where no Commerce students were enrolled) to schools in Mungeli district where Commerce students were available, finding the process complied with the rationalization policy and involved proper counselling by competent authorities. The court held that absence of substantiated evidence of discriminatory treatment or procedural irregularity precluded judicial interference in administrative employment decisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts