DEV KUMAR NIRMALKAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — REVP/136/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010171212026

Filing Number

REVP/9899/2026

Filing Date

25-Apr-2026

Registration No

REVP/136/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

REVIEW PETITON ( 1736 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEV KUMAR NIRMALKAR

    Adv. ABDUL WAHAB KHAN,ABDUL MOIN KHAN,ABDUL MOIN KHAN, ,ABHISHEK DAHARIYA,ABDUL MOIN KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Collector

  3. 3.Anuvibhagiya Adhikari

  4. 4.Tahsildar

  5. 5.Commissioner

  6. 6.Upper Commissioner

  7. 7.Karyapalan Abhityanta

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Dev Kumar Nirmalkar's review petition challenging the dismissal of his earlier writ petition concerning allotment of House N-1 under the Urban Poor Housing Scheme. The court found that respondent authorities substantially complied with their obligations by removing encroachment and offering possession, which the petitioner himself refused to accept on 10.02.2021 and again on 15.02.2021. However, the court directed authorities to reconsider the petitioner's representation for possession and house repairs in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 25-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. REVP/136/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Dev Kumar Nirmalkar's review petition challenging the dismissal of his earlier writ petition concerning allotment of House N-1 under the Urban Poor Housing Scheme. The court found that respondent authorities substantially complied with their obligations by removing encroachment and offering possession, which the petitioner himself refused to accept on 10.02.2021 and again on 15.02.2021. However, the court directed authorities to reconsider the petitioner's representation for possession and house repairs in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case