RAMDEEN JAISWAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1663/2020
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010171192020
Filing Number
WPC/8718/2020
Filing Date
29-Jul-2020
Registration No
WPC/1663/2020
Registration Date
29-Jul-2020
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMDEEN JAISWAL
Adv. RATNESH KUMAR AGRAWAL,Chandrashekhar Kaushik,Chandrashekhar Kaushik, ,Chandrashekhar Kaushik
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Collector (Food)
-
3.Assistant Registrar,
-
4.Chief Executive Officer,
Adv. JITENDRA SHRIVASTAVA
-
5.Branch Manager,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a writ petition filed by Ramdeen Jaiswal, in-charge of a Paddy Procurement Centre, challenging orders directing him to compensate for alleged shortage of paddy. The court permitted the petitioner to file a representation before the Collector under Clause 14 of the tripartite agreement within three weeks, allowing the Collector to adjudicate the matter, and directed that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner during this period, provided he submits the representation on time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
15-Sep-2020
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
-
30-Jul-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF
-
30-Jul-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jul-2020
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/1663/2020
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a writ petition filed by Ramdeen Jaiswal, in-charge of a Paddy Procurement Centre, challenging orders directing him to compensate for alleged shortage of paddy. The court permitted the petitioner to file a representation before the Collector under Clause 14 of the tripartite agreement within three weeks, allowing the Collector to adjudicate the matter, and directed that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner during this period, provided he submits the representation on time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts