ASHISH PATRE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1275/2026

Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010170732026

Filing Number

CRMP/7202/2026

Filing Date

25-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1275/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHISH PATRE

    Adv. TARUN DANSENA

  2. 2.Laxman Das Patre

  3. 3.Vimal Parte

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Smt. Abha Patre

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petition filed by Ashish Patre, Laxman Das Patre, and Vimal Parte seeking to quash criminal proceedings under IPC Section 498-A/34 (FIR No. 29/2022, Criminal Case No. 6249/2022). The court found the petition defectively drafted with vague prayers and noted the charge-framing order was annexed but not specifically challenged. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to refile with proper pleadings and appropriate relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 25-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petition filed by Ashish Patre, Laxman Das Patre, and Vimal Parte seeking to quash criminal proceedings under IPC Section 498-A/34 (FIR No. 29/2022, Criminal Case No. 6249/2022). The court found the petition defectively drafted with vague prayers and noted the charge-framing order was annexed but not specifically challenged. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to refile with proper pleadings and appropriate relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case