PREETAM TANDAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2164/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010170582026

Filing Number

WPC/9862/2026

Filing Date

25-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPC/2164/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 21 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RECOVERY OF DEBTS/BANK LOANS DUE UNDER THE BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. ( 2108 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PREETAM TANDAN

    Adv. CHANDRIKADITYA PANDEY,ABHIPREET BAJPAI,ABHIPREET BAJPAI, ,ANURAG BAJPAI,Kanhaiya Ram Yadav,MAMTA MAHILANGE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Tahsildar

  3. 3.HDFC Bank Limited

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WPC No. 2164/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted interim relief to petitioner Preetam Tandan by staying the eviction warrant dated 06.04.2026. The court found merit in the petitioner's argument that the Debts Recovery Tribunal at Jabalpur is non-functional and the backup tribunal at Lucknow lacks a presiding officer, leaving the petitioner without remedy to pursue his pending second appeal. The matter was adjourned to the first week of July 2026 for further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 25-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2164/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC No. 2164/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted interim relief to petitioner Preetam Tandan by staying the eviction warrant dated 06.04.2026. The court found merit in the petitioner's argument that the Debts Recovery Tribunal at Jabalpur is non-functional and the backup tribunal at Lucknow lacks a presiding officer, leaving the petitioner without remedy to pursue his pending second appeal. The matter was adjourned to the first week of July 2026 for further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case