REKHALAL BARLE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/1123/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010170202026
Filing Number
CRA/7178/2026
Filing Date
25-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRA/1123/2026
Registration Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
CRIMINAL MATTER IN WHICH SENTENCES AWARDED IS MORE THAN 2 YEARS AND UP TO 10 YEARS ( 1431 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.REKHALAL BARLE
Adv. SUNIL SAHU,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA, ,SAHIL SAHU,RAJENDRA PATEL,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA
-
2.Yogendra Barle
-
3.Nandu Barle
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: CRA/1123/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the bail application of three appellants (Rekhalal Barle, Yogendra Barle, and Nandu Barle) convicted of assault charges related to a speed breaker construction dispute. The appellants' jail sentences were suspended, and they were released on bail with personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each and two sureties, considering that appellant No. 1 had served 971+ days in custody and appellants 2-3 had served 189-229 days respectively. The court noted the victim died 27 days after the incident from post-operative septicemia rather than direct injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
25-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRA/1123/2026
Case Summary: CRA/1123/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the bail application of three appellants (Rekhalal Barle, Yogendra Barle, and Nandu Barle) convicted of assault charges related to a speed breaker construction dispute. The appellants' jail sentences were suspended, and they were released on bail with personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each and two sureties, considering that appellant No. 1 had served 971+ days in custody and appellants 2-3 had served 189-229 days respectively. The court noted the victim died 27 days after the incident from post-operative septicemia rather than direct injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts