KIRAN NEGI SHRUTI DEWANGAN, ,KAUSTUBH NANDE,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,Anchal Kumar Matre,Anchal Kumar Matre,HIMANSHU KUNJAM,HIMANSHU KUNJAM,HIMANSHU KUNJAM vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3826/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010170112026

Filing Number

WPS/9835/2026

Filing Date

25-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3826/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO POSTING / ATTACHMENT / RELIEVING / JOINING MATTER ( 633 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KIRAN NEGI SHRUTI DEWANGAN, ,KAUSTUBH NANDE,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,Anchal Kumar Matre,Anchal Kumar Matre,HIMANSHU KUNJAM,HIMANSHU KUNJAM,HIMANSHU KUNJAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Director,

  3. 3.The Deputy Director

  4. 4.The Joint Director

  5. 5.The district Education Officer

  6. 6.The Principal

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS 3826/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted the writ petition filed by Kiran Negi against the State of Chhattisgarh. Notice was issued to respondents without requiring payment of court fee, as the State's counsel accepted service. The State was granted 4 weeks to file its reply, and the case was adjourned for further hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 25-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3826/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS 3826/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted the writ petition filed by Kiran Negi against the State of Chhattisgarh. Notice was issued to respondents without requiring payment of court fee, as the State's counsel accepted service. The State was granted 4 weeks to file its reply, and the case was adjourned for further hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case